61 yo hipster does trackstands on cliff edges

:colbert:

That first shot is a terrible photoshop

They all look pretty fake to me, but I’m viewing them through a 5 year old laptop monitor.

i was about to post this.
does look kinda fake.
but if not:
holyshitwhatthefuckthatsamzing.

his seatpost is faced the wrong way.
it looks like hes riding a department store bmx bike.
fake.


so fucking fake it’s ridiculous.
what are his feet standing on?
edit: missing spokes wtf

where the fuck is the shadow?

edit:nevermind

i don’t think they are fake, they are just front lit with studio lights because it is still very dark dawn, and probably so they can have the dramatic sunrise in the background.

or maybe i just really want it to be real…

no brakes? Can’t see if there’s a coaster or not.

Has to be fake, flatland is dead.

lighting

welcome to photography everybody

[quote=prismism]i don’t think they are fake, they are just front lit with studio lights because it is still very dark dawn, and probably so they can have the dramatic sunrise in the background.

or maybe i just really want it to be real…[/quote]

[quote=GRHebard]lighting

welcome to photography everybody[/quote]

Lulz.

My thoughts exactly.

Doesnt mean its real, but it could be

[quote=GRHebard]lighting

welcome to photography everybody[/quote]
youre so clever

[quote=GRHebard]lighting

welcome to photography everybody[/quote]
weird I thought the purpose of lighting photographs well was to make the picture look nice and enhanced not make it look absurdly fake. guess I gotz some learnin’ to do.

I’m pretty sure it’s so you can make it look however the fuck you want it to

I’m pretty sure it still looks like shit. I guess if the photographer was going for a poorly lit picture he did an excellent job.

PWR:

The missing spokes is where his feet are standing in the first photo.

I realized that.

[quote=everythingwolf][quote=GRHebard]lighting

welcome to photography everybody[/quote]
youre so clever[/quote]
youre a chump