# Weird Build Dithering Thread Infinity: Part 2

**URL:** <https://tarck.cc/t/weird-build-dithering-thread-infinity-part-2/21629>\
**Category:** Bikes\
**Created:** [August 6, 2018, 7:03am UTC](https://tarck.cc/t/weird-build-dithering-thread-infinity-part-2/21629 "2018-08-06T07:03:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1283

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dotMR](https://static.tarck.cc/user_avatar/tarck.cc/dotmr/32/640_2.png) [@dotMR](https://tarck.cc/u/dotMR)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2020, 3:14pm UTC](https://tarck.cc/t/weird-build-dithering-thread-infinity-part-2/21629/1283 "2020-08-06T15:14:45Z")

</div>

that all sound so exhausting. Why can’t we just BSA68 and be happy?

if I could figure out a non-JA light mount situation for this Ritchey fork I’d probably already have it for the DayRuiner.

 ![ritchey-wcs-adventure-fork](https://cdn.tarck.cc/original/3X/8/3/839f1c0be1b85c4068c2074736441c282a32d1dc.jpeg)

- mounting a light on one side of the fork gives that awful wheel shadow
- bar mount gets in the way of any sort of bag attachment possibilities
- maybe mount on top of a fender?
- rig up a 3-point mount from each blade and then to the back of the fork crown?

---

_[View the full topic](https://tarck.cc/t/weird-build-dithering-thread-infinity-part-2/21629)._