we could had all gone over and Heath would have gotten too drunk to do stuff right
lol
that paramount looks beat to shit. I probably wouldn’t have bought that unless I could have inspected it first.
The only people who deserve nice vintage bikes are the ones who have taken the time and made the effort to learn why they should appreciate them.
itt: people say buy that bike or else. Then… when bike isn’t bought, people say that bike is the worst bike ever.
^ i don’t get that attitude either. yeah, it was a little ratty, but the seller said it was cosmetic and heath was going to help him out so it seems like it could’ve been a great deal, especially when you consider that finding a 66cm frame of decent quality isn’t the easiest order.
anyway whatever. let sol ride around on ill-fitting crap til he gets his shit together.
Well at least one person here agrees with me.
paramount. too beat.
SOL BUY THIS TREK!!!
http://serotta.com/forum/showthread.php?t=64959
25" = 63.5cm
maybe dude measured top tube wrong…
edit: oh NVM it’s a bridgestone. still better than your current bike sol but not as nice as a trek which i thought it was fro some reason…
by trek do you mean bstone?
I have the 25" Trek. it’s not big enough for sol. he needs like 66.
dude already has a few 63cm bikes that are too small.
Well at least one person here agrees with me.[/quote]
Cosmetic. I wasn’t worried. I’ve refurbed frames in worse condx.
thats what im worried about dude. super long legs x not so much long upper body collabo
Did you buy said frames on eBay for over $200?
Did you buy said frames on eBay for over $200?[/quote]
oshii
Did you buy said frames on eBay for over $200?[/quote]
Not really. None of them were Paramounts, though. Actually, I think I did spend nearly $200 (with shipping) for the Allez that I built up for pookie. I was having a hard time finding a frame small enough and that one was perfect. I’d have bought that for $200 for myself.
i found a 65 cm Raleigh frame you could of had for free. To bad it was last year