Perhaps that is why the very top is thinner and takes that smaller clamp. On the other hand, I find it hard to believe that this carbon tube is that complex of an engineering feat. It’ll also be clamped on the outside by a seatpost clamp and have the post inside of it.
@jame5on yes, I can limit travel, but the point is to have more travel and to have the limit of that travel be 2 cm lower than it currently is.
Gosh, I want an old cracked carbon part to practice on and observe. The park tool video dudes cutting seatpost masts just do it like they would cut a steerer, using a hacksaw blade and a guide.
If I go through with this, I’ll probably use a dremel like the worldwide cyclery guy did. Gonna swing by the lbs and ask if they have any broken carbon parts I can gave lol.
it’s what you’ll be left with that may or may not be useful to you
your plan is to just put a bigger seatpost collar farther down the tube?
like mentioned above, they designed a portion to be clamped to and made it a consistent size all the way around. I wouldn’t be interested in clamping farther down but hey if someone else did it somewhere, scratch the itch
When I dremmeled my stearer it was not very pretty around the rim. Tried to use a hose clamp as a guide and drummer cutter went through the hose clamp easier than the carbon
Yeah, I measured the section where I want to clamp to 36.4mm and test fit the clamp that I purchased (see scuffs in photo) so I’m hypothesizing that it is some standard thicker seat tube layup. The post will also be bottomed out at the collar, so the only clamping force required is to keep it from spinning laterally.
You’re only taking 2cm? Seems like unnecessary risk for marginal gains. How much less will the saddle get in the way 2cm lower? Can you just buy a post with a smaller max insertion to saddle rail dimension?
2cm is a vast difference when it comes to your saddle position. In addition, the new post make more efficient use of the stack between the seat tube and rails. Part of the point is also to complete an unspeakable bike project.
But I made some discoveries. Namely that my current seatpost only has 150mm of travel! I think that I could get that number up to 180 with no chopping due to the OneUp post’s more efficient use of space. It isn’t quite the 210 I wanted, but would probably be cromulent enough.
I think that I could sneak a 210 in there, but it gets close to where the seat tube bends:
Which kind of tempts me even more. Use of space would be absolutely MAXIMIZED (though for 210mm of travel I’d have to take 34mm off the top )
I was thinking also that maybe someone in the area can go look at this for me and I could return the new dropper post and the $100 of cutting implements I bought to put that money toward the frame instead lol
If I install the sram automatic coaster hub I just brought on a vertically dropped out bike, can I use a fixed singulator device to tension the chain, and still do back-pedal braking?
I hope that version is better than the torpedo duomatic i had years ago. It was not a great riding experience. Paid $30 for the hub in 2008 and sold it built up for $130 18 months later
I guess it depends how solid the tensioner is. The one I normally use is locked in place, but back pedal pressure might over-load it. The sram ones seem to have a reasonable reputation I think @Blakey . Maybe I will go thru the bins and look for an old track bike…