Rear looks like totally cromulet FM160, so you can run a reasonable sized rotor without a dumb adapter. But yeah building a high-end frame/fork intended for drop bars in TYOOL 2024 with IS tabs and expecting your customers to either run the one (1) and only weird IS-to-flat adapter, OR bend over backwards to mix & match components, uhh…
can prolly blame this one on prolly
“The Ponderosa features a gravel bike drivetrain, with a BSA 38 x 68 mm bottom bracket shell”
i have literally never heard anyone refer to a BSA threaded BB shell this way. is this the T47-advocate version of Stallman insisting on calling it “GNU/Linux”?
EC37 headset? what the hell. Thanks bud for making sure your customers can never buy a normal headset.
I can see post front / flat back, since you need less braking power in the rear and snugging that caliper inside the stays gives you more flexibility with racks and fenders. Post gives you the flexibility to run a beefier brake.
IS instead of post mount is a bit of a head-scratcher though.
I’ve seen a few bikes that SEEM to have improper rotor contact but when you pull the pads they are getting full contact. Not saying that’s what is happening here. But it could be.
I was just in Boulder and was surprised to see that Skratch took over TPC’s entire warehouse, after TPC expanded into Rockymounts’ vacant space. Looks like they moved to an even bigger space in Louisville