Yeah but what’s the rb1 with clearance for 32s?
the RB1
I wonder what Grant thinks about sandwiches.
If we look back I wrote an email to grant and he said the rb1 was designed around 28s which were actually 25s
RB-T then
I guess I’m extrapolating the implication from the “don’t go to a bike shop because you’ll get sold an uncomfortable race bike you don’t want” argument. If you don’t go to a bike shop you can’t buy a reasonable hybrid either.
I don’t disagree with you on this point. But I think the arguments he uses to sell that mindset are confusing.
srsly, used (US)BMC Road
Yes.
the most under-appreciated (and sadly discontinued) bike in Mike’s lineup
it wasn’t gonna be a bike for me but I was still disappointed when he announced he was canning plans for the 700x35 disco followup to it, i was planning to recommend it to several friends
BUT R&E SHOULD KNOW BETTER!!!
And my know better I mean figure out how to get the right fit and also make a good looking bike.
Also grant had a lot of influence and we can see the whole gravgrav thing as basically everyone taking his best ideas and running with it. I’d like a $4000 riv bum bike but my Kona dew for $700 sure does just fine.
i am not nearly as much of a consumer of the grant/jan stuff as most of you but here is what i find irritating.
nice thing to say: this particular product works / doesn’t work for me
grant/jan thing to say: this particular product is BETTER THAN this other product
i love a good hot take as much as the next person but excluding people or making them feel bad about their choices (or even have to justify their choices) is annoying.
i am on a cycling team. it’s mostly roadies. although they’re not really the accepting type (some boomers), they don’t care that i ride around on a canyon with 32s and they’re on tarmacs. sometimes we get into the good natured shit talking because KNOW EACH OTHER.
things someone is going to comment in response:
- grant doesn’t sell bikes he sells a lifestyle.
yes that is true, i don’t care, i find him annoying because he has to say that his stuff is better - his stuff is better for most people
i also don’t care, why not just say “my stuff is good, make your own choice” - he walked back his initial anti-chamois post
the fact that he even wrote it in the first place shows his attitude
tldr: just don’t yuck anyone else’s yum and you’ll be viewed in a more positive light
the thing that you are all criticizing is not the man - It’s his marketing strategy.
That strategy has been arguably fairly successful in a very niche world.
bicycle marketing strategies I find damaging or distasteful:
- planned obsolescence
- unnecessary new standards
- racey looking bike styling to lure new riders
- making your bike worse to build brand identity
- selling matching neon pajamas to the DHers
- reinforcing the idea that they guy who spends the most wins
- bike ads that feature a truck more prominently than the bike
- brand exclusive standards
- eXtreme anything
- skidding videos
- rebranding
- convincing the world that riding on a dirt road is a lifestyle choice
- novelty for it’s own sake
bicycle marketing strategies that I find fairly innocuous:
- a couple of old white guys selling boutique parts out of their garages being grouchy on the internet
- creating a market for silver components
and just to beat a dead horse. the point of online marketing is to increase engagement. it doesn’t really matter whether that engagement is positive or negative.
wondering if everyone gets this upset when the guy at the smoke shop says grape swishers put holes in your brain or that the filter on a black n mild is the “cancer part”
exactly, I’m sure all the people who sell organic food would sell more if they were like “processed food is cool too”
Grant’s not a bike shop. He sells a specific yum to people who find something else yucky.
It’s not a zero sum game. If Grant convinces someone they don’t need a chammy, some roadie doesn’t give up and quit.
I love this thread
Seriously, good luck finding a consumer product which is marketed like “We’re good but everything else is good too”
this is not what i said. there’s a huge difference between “we’re good and everything else is good too”
and
“we’re good”
and then there’s
“we’re good because they suck” which is the one that annoys me
everything else isn’t good tho
the only thing I’ve learned from this thread is that @jame5on is a grant sockpuppet