Post your Dirty Jumper

[quote=hiljentaa][quote=Dirty Sanchez]
need an oversized HT for that, every damn full carbon disc fork has a tapered steerer (save for goofball longer ones intended for 26" mtb)[/quote]

Do you know of any standard 1.25" carbon dick forks besides Wound Up? Alloy steerers are acceptable.[/quote]

Whisky
Spot
the Bikeisland one
older Ritchey full crabon w/removable canti posts

Can I run a 12-30 cassette on a short cage 5600 derailer if I’m careful not to crosschain on a compact?

subquestion: Can I run it as a 1x10?

^ Kyle got confused with all the chitchat in PYB and thought it was the DQ thread.

i got some fen-derps, finally

those paddles really blow and i need new ones… but i was pretty sick of riding eggbeaters to class all the time

Looks fun, Alex. When are you moving out this-a-way?

Thanks Jimmy. It’s a pretty great bike but it’s been keeping me away from my GT for too long!

I’ll be moving over to Seattle at the very end of February… Super excited!

I see the bike is ready :bear:

[quote=hiljentaa][quote=Dirty Sanchez]
need an oversized HT for that, every damn full carbon disc fork has a tapered steerer (save for goofball longer ones intended for 26" mtb)[/quote]

Do you know of any standard 1.25" carbon dick forks besides Wound Up? Alloy steerers are acceptable.[/quote]

do you mean 1.125"?

sup new page of pyb thread, didn’t realize you were here

Raisins are just dried grapes!!

The 1.125" Whisky fork with the alloy steerer IS the Winwood one. Q bought up the whole stock and stuck new paint on 'em. I rode one for a while, it’s a perfectly good fork, but not as nice as the full-carbon Whisky ones.

Spot fork has an alloy steerer too.

Full carbon + straight steerer is pretty much a no-go.

Here’s a closed auction for the Ritchey I was talking about.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Tom-Ritchey-WCS-Carbon-Cyclocross-Fork-700c-Disk-Brake-Or-Standard-Brake-48mm-/170950956046?

…unless the seller was wrong and it’s really the 26" mountain version.

There are still examples of those floating around but no idea what the a-to-c is.

http://www.jejamescycles.co.uk/ritchey-wcs-mtb-fork-26in-disc-only-id68009.html

Lightly used Record 10-speed levers acquired. And just to be absolutely sure, I got a jtek shiftmate too.

I’m stoked to not have to use crappy SRAM shakes

[quote=Fergie]Lightly used Record 10-speed levers acquired. And just to be absolutely sure, I got a jtek shiftmate too.

I’m stoked to not have to use crappy SRAM shakes[/quote]

Keen to hear back on how it works without the shiftmate (#5S?).

Raisins are just dried grapes!!

The 1.125" Whisky fork with the alloy steerer IS the Winwood one. Q bought up the whole stock and stuck new paint on 'em. I rode one for a while, it’s a perfectly good fork, but not as nice as the full-carbon Whisky ones.[/quote]

Whisky IS Winwood, just with mpls hipsters doing the graphics and marketing this time around.

QBP created both, and Winwood was wound down just as Whisky started selling the same old open-mold shit. The same forks show up on Bikesdirect bikes, in SBS and on Redlines, and from a variety of eBay sellers.

there aren’t new ones being designed, but they totally exist:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mr-ride-Picasia-fork-FM01-3K-Matt-carbon-Disc-Only-FORK-26-460g-Black-Trigon-/330838536622

[quote=tarckeemars]Here’s a closed auction for the Ritchey I was talking about.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Tom-Ritchey-WCS-Carbon-Cyclocross-Fork-700c-Disk-Brake-Or-Standard-Brake-48mm-/170950956046?

…unless the seller was wrong and it’s really the 26" mountain version.

There are still examples of those floating around but no idea what the a-to-c is.

Trigon is the house brand of the OEM for those generations of Ritchey forks.

The axle-to-crown is 420mm, and they always weigh under 500g with an uncut 300mm steerer. Never heard of any trouble with one either, and they clear CX tires no problem. But with that axle to crown, you pretty much have to design the frame around it.

CX-70[/quote]
he’s running a 30t small front? 32t?
CX-70 is rated down to like 34t, right?
obviously you can go beyond Shimanos ratings, but it’s not gonna perform as well.
why recommend that over a derailleur that is rated 30-52?
seems like all your shifting issues are upshifting, yes? ans a derailleur shaped to pick up off a 30t small ring would be superior.
I’m not just saying this hypothetically either, I have a 6603 pusher with a 30-46 and it works excellent.[/quote]

It’s Shimano of course it works excellent.

But when you get out of the norm with pushers you really tend to want less shaping not more, to preserve clearances and not have bulbous shit get in the way.

The CX-70 has several extra bonuses for this situation:
The outer cage is curved to a much tighter radius, it’s optimized for a 46t big ring and can’t take more then 50t.
The tail of the cage doesn’t extend so far down, so you can move it down really far without it hitting the chainstay.

Just rode it on a bunch of Rivendells with megafred gearing setups, worked really terrific.

The other secret FD for this situation are the Campy CTs from 07 & 08. They also have a hard 50t max on the outer, and the inner plate extends super far down in a triangle like on some triple pushers, but still having a trad double pusher profile. I’ve got the Chorus one on my rSogn.

Rivendell used to have a huge deadstock of Mirage CT pushers, and now they sell the CX-70.

running cx70 w/ a 48-32 wi vbc setup. rules.
previously had xtr m900 triple fd that I never was happy with
despite having the profile & shape & capacity for such chainrings.
the arc of the swing was too long, if that makes any sense.
also had a fsa gossamer c-16 fd that performed well
recommended despite being fsa. braze-on $20 ebay dealio. good stuff.

1.125 straight carbon disc fork is relevant to my interest.

traded a bike i didn’t ride enough for this in stock form. added the bars, stem, saddle, post, tires, XD triple and BB5s all from the bike mess. probably going to swap a bunch of apex i already own onto it, but the shimano 2300 8sp stuff is actually pretty good, if you don’t mind the thumb buttons.

[quote=Dirty Sanchez]

[quote=tarckeemars]Here’s a closed auction for the Ritchey I was talking about.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Tom-Ritchey-WCS-Carbon-Cyclocross-Fork-700c-Disk-Brake-Or-Standard-Brake-48mm-/170950956046?

…unless the seller was wrong and it’s really the 26" mountain version.

There are still examples of those floating around but no idea what the a-to-c is.

http://www.jejamescycles.co.uk/ritchey-wcs-mtb-fork-26in-disc-only-id68009.html[/quote]

Trigon is the house brand of the OEM for those generations of Ritchey forks.

The axle-to-crown is 420mm, and they always weigh under 500g with an uncut 300mm steerer. Never heard of any trouble with one either, and they clear CX tires no problem. But with that axle to crown, you pretty much have to design the frame around it.[/quote]

Yep. I remember the Trigon coming up when I was getting the money together for Carl to build me that frame. I decided that I wanted more conventional cross fork dimensions.

Now if only I had thought to have him do a 44mm head tube. Oh well. It wasn’t much of a thing then.

Unless Whisky actually coughs up the full crabon straight fork they’ve mentioned I will probably not be getting a crabon frok.