Tonic Fab Supernauts and bickering...

while there is obviously no advantage to having your rear wheel “slammed,” it’s really not that hard to get it out of track ends, no matter where it is. i have a fix/fix rear hub, and when i run my 18t (bigger) side the wheel ends up being millimeters from the front of the ends. all i do is work the chain off the chainring with a third-ish pedal rotation. it takes me five seconds longer than just slipping the chain off the cog.

that said, small dropouts suck fucking ass, because you can’t run a fixed/fixed setup. so, fuck that. maybe somebody already mentioned this, but there is way too much bullshit to wade through in this thread.

I actually know a few guys that push their bikes in a counter-clockwise oval. They can feel the difference in stiffness - but they have the legs of quarterhorses and can clock 50 on a keirin. They would know the difference, so they ride aluminum or carbon. I personally like a bit of flex, so I go with steel. I personally would never be able to tell the difference in speed, but I ain’t racing. I’m just stating proven fact. Less material is always lighter. And no mattert how stiff your crankset is, if the frame is flexing, a stiffer crankset ain’t gonna fix it. It would probably make it worse by putting more stress on the already stressed flex points.

As far as the weight difference: most of us couldn’t feel the dif (inluding me), but anyone putting serious mileage on a bike with time against them (messengers and racers), would. THat is why high end road frames are measured in grams.

my 2 cents

if messengers really cared about grams, they wouldn’t be riding around with turbos and brooks.

Sometimes, folks trade weight for durability and comfort. Not all. Some. Myself included (see BMW and Brooks)

and i don’t care who you are, nobody is gonna notice a 50 gram difference while riding. there’s this myth that really serious or really skilled cyclists can recognize miniscule differences in stiffness/weight while we lowly amateurs can’t, but for the most part, i say that’s bullshit.

if you put lance armstrong on that supernaut contraption with 1-inch-long trackends and then put him on that one in the picture, besides the one with the longer track ends being wildly more convenient, he would never know.

haha nice! who changed the title of the thread?

[quote=“reedreeder”]and i don’t care who you are, nobody is gonna notice a 50 gram difference while riding. there’s this myth that really serious or really skilled cyclists can recognize miniscule differences in stiffness/weight while we lowly amateurs can’t, but for the most part, i say that’s bullshit.

if you put lance armstrong on that supernaut contraption with 1-inch-long trackends and then put him on that one in the picture, besides the one with the longer track ends being wildly more convenient, he would never know.[/quote]

You are assuming that that is the only place they saved weight. I would venture a guess that Tonic also cut weight by carefully choosing tube thickness and material, headtube design, etc. Shit adds up fast. If every time someone looked at a dropout, headtube, etc and they said “nobody is gonna notice 40 grams”, all our bikes would weigh about a pound more. Little steps make up a long walk.

I changed the thread title but decided that it’s not all bullshit. There is some actual respectable debate going on here (thanks, Reedreeder). I’m taking suggestions on another title. Here are a few I came up with.

Tonic Supernauts and Kabuki is an idiot

Tonic Supernauts and if I think it’s ugly, Kabuki is stupid

Tonic Supernauts and the merit of taking a punch

Tonic Supernauts and the idea of good design

You really just refuse to give up, don’t you? Just drop it.

I never give up. You punch me in the forehead, I will dance on your skull.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnprolly/3043600257/

Then we will fight in the shade.

http://www.hotflick.net/flicks/2006_300 ... ah_005.jpg[/quote]

[quote=“TimArchy”]

I’m sure it’s a fine design and probably quite durable. But I’ve got a campy record loose ball headset on my '81 eddy merckx that’s still working great after 27 years. Durability hasn’t generally been an issue with well maintained headsets, regardless of the technology put into designing them. As for the upper cup, it looks a lot like a really wide spacer to me. It would be nice if it was painted the same color as the frame, but then it would look like the extended head tube you were trying to avoid.

It’s a cool bike, no doubt. A lot of thought has gone into making it look better to some people without losing much functionality. And if $1,100 gets a frame with custom geometry, then it’s actually a pretty good deal. Can you get custom geometry?[/quote]

First off, I’d like to clarify the frame, fork and headset is $1150.

I’m glad you enjoy 1" threaded headsets and have managed to maintain one for 27 years of riding.
I brought up durability because I’m aware of some concern a rider could somehow wear or wreck the an integrated HT and render the bike useless. I suppose anything is possible, but it’s very unlikely this would be a problem. To begin with, you’d have ride the bike very hard for a long time with an incredibly loose headset to even begin to be able to damage the HT. We machine the head tubes after welding to ensure the best surface possible for the bearing to sit on.

As for custom geometry…of course it’s possible. Just contact me. landon@tonicfab.com

Here’s our set-up for machining Integrated HT’s.

[quote=“reedreeder”]
that said, small dropouts suck fucking ass, because you can’t run a fixed/fixed setup. so, fuck that. maybe somebody already mentioned this, but there is way too much bullshit to wade through in this thread.[/quote]

As mentioned, I have increased the length of the DO slot on the Supernauts. The new drops are long enough to accommodate a reasonable gear change.

You are entitled to you opinions. It may surprise you to discover there’s a whole world of riders who actually like small dropouts. We’ve been selling this bike for a year. It’s got tiny slots, and I haven’t heard a single complaint. For riders not constantly changing gears (like myself) small drops are actually preferred.

I’m done.

Our website should be completely updated with in a week or so with lots of SN info. If are interested in the bike, or want to find out more about Tonic, please write me.

landon@tonicfab.com

Thanks,

Landon.

Thanks alot for clearing things up Landon.
I think it’s awesome that you’ve been willing to talk this out with us bunch of eDorks.

[quote=“Rusty Piton”]Thanks alot for clearing things up Landon.
I think it’s awesome that you’ve been willing to talk this out with us bunch of eDorks.[/quote]

[quote=“kowloon”][quote=“Rusty Piton”]Thanks alot for clearing things up Landon.
I think it’s awesome that you’ve been willing to talk this out with us bunch of eDorks.[/quote][/quote]

My opinion is slowly changing about this frame. $1150 for custom geometry isn’t bad at all. Coming from more of a street racing background, having a tough city bike that doesn’t have stupid modifications just for tricks is appealing. The problem here is that Landon posed all these modifications as “solutions” to problems that no one really had a problem with. If the bike can be built to your measurements, you shouldn’t need spacers under the stem, so raising the top cup above the head tube would be pointless. As for the dropouts, there’s really no reason (on most frames) that you can’t just cut the last inch off if it really bugs you that much.

If i was looking for a $1000 frame, I’d probably go for a panasonic first because they look good, have been building frames for a long ass time and their stock geometry suits me really well. But high up on the list would probably be this supernaut.

Anyway, Landon should have said that these frames were custom right off the bat. $1150 for an off the peg frame is pretty damn steep, but it’s a good price for custom.

True, and really the welds look nice. I’m just not into the design philosophy. There are a few companies that do full custom steel for pretty cheap. Curtloand Proletariat come to mind.

[quote=“TimArchy”]My opinion is slowly changing about this frame. $1150 for custom geometry isn’t bad at all. Coming from more of a street racing background, having a tough city bike that doesn’t have stupid modifications just for tricks is appealing. The problem here is that Landon posed all these modifications as “solutions” to problems that no one really had a problem with. If the bike can be built to your measurements, you shouldn’t need spacers under the stem, so raising the top cup above the head tube would be pointless. As for the dropouts, there’s really no reason (on most frames) that you can’t just cut the last inch off if it really bugs you that much.

If i was looking for a $1000 frame, I’d probably go for a panasonic first because they look good, have been building frames for a long ass time and their stock geometry suits me really well. But high up on the list would probably be this supernaut.

Anyway, Landon should have said that these frames were custom right off the bat. $1150 for an off the peg frame is pretty damn steep, but it’s a good price for custom.[/quote]

+1

the one on the first page of this thread is ugly and has silly short DO’s, but if i can say how long i want mine and how the bike looks then i guess that takes care of that.

[quote=“Kabuki”]but I figured there would be a lot of sheep on this forum.
baaaaa baaaaa baaaaa![/quote]

Hahahhahaihsvkauhsdfhahah. Holy crap are you annoying.

I got to this thread so late.

Can you all please call them track ends, since they’re track ends?

kthnxbai

Once more for the sake of clarity.

Frame and fork (unpainted) and headset are $1150. I don’t know what a “frame only” price would be. Probably closer to $850.

We build bikes in small production runs. Building bikes like this keeps the quality very high, and the price reasonable. You may neither understand nor agree with either of those statements, but everything in my experience proves this to be the case.

Our (myself and my partner, Tony) background is in bicycle manufacturing. We’ve worked at Kinesis and Sapa, large producers of mostly aluminum suspension bikes. Although we did some steel projects at Kinesis. I believe Tony started at Kinesis in '96 and myself in '01. We are not recent UBI graduates. When that poster mentioned he’d rather get a Panasonic because they’ve been building bikes a long time…I agree. I think that’s very sound reasoning.

I’m not a “designer” either, but I know what I like. I’m also a guy who has looked at a LOT of unpainted frames over the years. Some distinguishable, some not.

It’s important to me that our frames are recognizable without huge logos. Maybe this means something to you, maybe it doesn’t. However, it inspired me to maintain a continuity of design with our bikes that I feel is very important. I don’t think the Supernaut track frame is far off from our Fall Guy, or our Cross bike. I’m proud of that. Perhaps our design language is 180 degrees from what you prefer. That’s absolutely fine with me, and I don’t seek to sway your opinion in this regard. You may not like the way our frames look, but they do work very well. We have a team and between them, and myself nothing is going to get sold which doesn’t work. For example (again) the Supernaut dropouts. Alfred thought they where too small to be practical for track racing. So, they got changed.

To place where I’m coming from in some sort of context…I prefer Hutch over Hetchins. While I respect craft / vintage bike culture, what Klein was doing in the early '90’s is far more interesting to me.

Anyway, I suppose this is a long way of explaining yes, we can tweak a Supernaut. The cost do do so will vary according to the change. For example, we just finished a Supernaut with a level top tube. We didn’t charge for this. As far as geometry changes…I’d prefer someone get in touch with me via email to discuss this.

However, we aren’t going to build a “custom” bike with Paul’s dropouts or other off the self parts and small tubing. There’s nothing wrong with a bike like that, but it isn’t a Tonic.

Fortunately, loads of other people are doing exactly that. Probably 25 in PDX alone.

As far as fit and headset spacers and what not. A longer HT can be problem on a track frame because the higher BB can really eat up stand over height. One solution is to just have a (relative) mile of head tube sticking above the top tube. We chose to use shorter head tubes to keep the top tube height in check for a given size. Our headset adds between 28.5 and 41.5 mm to the HT length, depending on which top cap you choose. I think this arangement is far more attractive than headset spacers, but who am I judge?

If that still doesn’t make sense, yes we can build the frame with a standard HT.

Thanks.

-L