Damn why even buy a jones if Mystery Jeff isnāt gonna do a once-over on your bike himself and make sure your rotors are gigantic. And then call you at 11pm.
Iāll take the chain off and double double check that measurement tonight. Mine wonāt be exact exact since it has the EBB shell so there will be a slight difference if that is slightly off to one side or the other (but it didnāt look obviously misaligned last night).
Thatās a chainline for a 157 mm hub. Looking at the specs on Jonesā site, you might have a 148 mm hub? That would need a 53 mm chainline, typically.
Mine measures 54.0mm to the tip of a narrow tooth (31.95 ST diameter, ~38.08 ST to tooth).
I measured about 6mm between the tire and the chain in the largest cog on my LWB, same drivetrain as you just bought with the stock Jones aluminum rims and T-Fatty tires.
I put some parts I had lingering in the shed onto my kids bike so she is ready for commuting to work this summer and at UW in September. I wonder how long it will take to get stolen on campus.
Hot take from the trenches: MTB chainlines are all off by at least 3mm or so of offset and usually to make room for swing arm design near the bottom bracket.
Iāve always found that a non-boost ring runs better on a boost bike if it clears.
I think the ācenterā of the cassette for chainline should actually be 1 or 2 cogs lower than true center to improve chain articulation in the really big cogs where it matters.
Boost was developed when a 42 or 46t largest cog was still the standard and I suspect would have gone a different way if 51/52 was already in circulation.
The creation of superboost supports this as Pivot said point blank itās there to improve chainstay and lower link stiffness.